Blog

A report nobody opens is worth nothing. The owners who actually move scores treat the diagnostic as a backlog input, not a PDF to forward and forget.

Lead with three priorities tied to revenue or risk, not a fifty-item list. "Mobile homepage loads in 6 seconds, costing roughly 8 enquiries a month" lands harder than "improve Core Web Vitals". Pick the three findings with the biggest dollar impact in the report and treat the rest as backlog. Anything more than three at once and your team will quietly defer all of it.

Attach an owner and a date to each one. "Someone should look at SEO" is not a task; "Jess to ship lazy-loaded hero images by Friday 14th" is. If your developer is external, the same principle applies: a written scope with a deadline beats a forwarded report and a hopeful email.

Know when to bring in a specialist

General developers ship excellent code but rarely live and breathe AI search visibility. There is a real difference between fixing what a diagnostic flags and understanding why the underlying signal moves: schema modelling, entity consistency, the structural choices that get a business cited in generative answers. When the findings cluster around AI visibility, GEO, or competitor positioning, that is usually the moment to bring in someone who works on those problems full-time rather than asking your web team to learn on the job.

Re-scan after each release so effort shows up as a visible score change. Your developer fixed the mobile LCP? You should see it in the next report. If you cannot, the fix did not land in production, or it did not address what you thought it did. Either way, that is useful to know before you sign the invoice.